Dogra Rule: A Curse or a Boon for Kashmiri Muslims? A Scholarly Analysis
The Dogra rule (1846–1947) in Jammu and Kashmir remains one of the most contested periods in Kashmiri history. While proponents credit it with administrative reforms and infrastructure development, critics highlight the economic, religious, and social oppression endured by Kashmiri Muslims. This study presents a balanced analysis of both perspectives, supported by historical records, eyewitness accounts, and colonial-era documentation.
1. Genesis of Dogra Rule: Kashmir Sold Like Property
The Treaty of Amritsar (1846) was a defining moment in Kashmiri history. Following the Anglo-Sikh War, the British, seeking a loyal buffer state, sold Kashmir to Maharaja Gulab Singh for 7.5 million Nanakshahi rupees.
The treaty’s text explicitly transferred not only land but also the people and livestock of Kashmir:
“The British government transfers and makes over, for ever, in independent possession, to Maharaja Gulab Singh and the heirs male of his body all the hilly or mountainous country… together with all the inhabitants thereof.”
(Treaty of Amritsar, 1846)
This sale reduced Kashmiris to subjects of a feudal regime with no say in their governance. British travelers and officials, such as Sir Walter R. Lawrence (The Valley of Kashmir, 1895), describe how Kashmiris viewed the Dogra rule:
“Sold like cattle, the people of Kashmir became slaves in their own land.”
This sense of alienation and betrayal set the stage for one of the most exploitative feudal systems in South Asian history.
2. Economic Exploitation: The Forced Labor (Begar) System
One of the most infamous aspects of Dogra rule was the begar (forced labor) system, which disproportionately affected Kashmiri Muslims.
a) Forced Unpaid Labor in Agriculture and Public Works
“It was common to see Kashmiri men, bent double under loads heavier than themselves, whipped and beaten if they collapsed under the weight.”
b) Forced Labor in the Pashmina Industry
Even British officials recognized the brutality of the Dogra taxation system. According to Walter R. Lawrence (1895):
“The peasant was taxed so heavily that when famine came, he had nothing left to eat. His fields, his cattle, even his children—everything belonged to the state.”
This led to periodic famines and mass starvation, as Kashmir’s Muslim peasantry remained trapped in a cycle of debt and forced labor.
3. Religious Discrimination: Destruction of Mosques & Marginalization
The Dogra rulers institutionalized religious discrimination, favoring Hindus while restricting Kashmiri Muslims’ religious and civil liberties.
a) Demolition and Misuse of Mosques
b) Ban on Cow Slaughter & Religious Persecution
“The state exercised control over religious activities of Muslims, limiting their freedom to construct new mosques while allowing temples to flourish.”
This systematic suppression of Islamic identity fueled resentment and laid the groundwork for political resistance.
4. Sexual Exploitation: State-Sanctioned Prostitution
Economic hardship and desperation forced many Kashmiri Muslim women into prostitution.
“The destitution of Muslim families was so extreme that some women, to escape starvation, ended up in the brothels of Srinagar.”
5. The 1931 Massacre: The Breaking Point
Decades of oppression led to mass political awakening among Kashmiri Muslims. The breaking point came on July 13, 1931, when protests against Dogra rule resulted in state-sponsored violence.
This incident is widely regarded as the birth of modern political consciousness in Kashmir. As recorded in Prem Nath Bazaz’s The History of Struggle for Freedom in Kashmir:
“July 13, 1931, was the day when fear disappeared and the masses rose to challenge the injustice meted out to them for nearly a century.”
The massacre was commemorated annually as Martyrs’ Day (Youm-e-Shuhada) until recent political shifts in 2019.
“For the first time, Kashmir’s Muslims began to see themselves as a political force.” (Glancy Report, 1932)
6. Social Upliftment or Strategic Placation? Dogra Reforms in the Late Period
While earlier decades were characterized by repression, the 1930s and 40s saw selective reforms, often under British pressure and in response to rising Muslim political consciousness.
a) The Glancy Commission (1932)
b) Formation of the Muslim Conference (1932)
Even these so-called reforms were seen by many scholars as cosmetic attempts to preserve the monarchy, not genuine social upliftment.
7. Education and Representation: A Glaring Disparity
As Basharat Peer notes in Curfewed Night:
“The state treated its Muslim majority like a conquered people—deprived of dignity, education, and voice.”
8. Conclusion: A Period of Suffering for Kashmiri Muslims
While the Dogra rule brought some modernization, including legal reforms (Ranbir Penal Code) and infrastructure development, these benefits were largely for the elite classes. For Kashmiri Muslims, especially peasants, it was a period of extreme suffering, marked by:
The suffering under Dogra rule eventually triggered the political movements of the 1930s and 1940s, leading to the events of 1947 and Kashmir’s changing political landscape.
Thus, for Kashmiri Muslims, the Dogra era was more of a curse than a boon.
Key References